Last week I hosted a webinar, Steel Yourselves, at the Association for Software Testing.
I'd been thinking about the format for a while and waiting for an opportunity to try it out with speakers that I knew would be able to do it justice.
There's an interesting debating tactic in which the idea is ...
... to help one's opponent to construct the strongest form of their argument. This may involve removing flawed assumptions that could be easily refuted, for example, so that one produces the best argument for the 'core' of one's opponent's position.
I thought it would be interesting to have speakers take a testing concept they are opposed to and construct a case for it, present it, defend it during a Q&A, then talk about what they learned and how they felt.
I thought it would be challenging for the speaker
— a chance to find something out about their views — and inspiring for the audience — a
chance to see someone prepared to think critically and deeply about their perspectives and make
themselves vulnerable in public at the same time.
I wanted to call it Steel
Yourselves to reflect the strengthening aspect of this kind of argument, show respect for the the guts that the participants require, and flag to the audience that something unexpected might be presented.
So I did it! And it was a lot of the things I'd hoped it would be! And now you can watch it too!
With enormous thanks to Fiona Charles and Ilari Henrik Aegerter for their enthusiastic participation and nerves of steel.
Comments
Post a Comment