Skip to main content

My Adidas

If you've met me anywhere outside of a wedding or funeral, a snowy day, or a muddy field in the last 20 years you'll have seen me in Adidas Superstar trainers. But why? This post is for April Cools' Club

--00--

I'm the butt of many jokes in our house, but not having a good memory features prominently amongst them. See also being bald ("do you need a hat, Dad?"), wearing jeans that have elastane in them (they're very comfy but "oh look, he's got the jeggings on again!"), and finding joy in contorted puns ("no-one's laughing except you, you know that, right?")

Which is why it's interesting that I have a very strong, if admittedly not complete, memory of the first time I heard Run DMC. Raising Hell, their third album, was released in the UK in May 1986 and I bought it pretty much immediately after hearing it on the evening show on Radio 1, probably presented by Janice Long, while doing my homework. More listening than homeworking, if I'm honest. I would have been around 14.

I bought the two earlier albums, Run DMC and King of Rock, as soon as funds would allow, and still have and play all three today, despite selling a huge portion of my record collection a few years ago when we needed space at home. 

I still occasionally kick myself too, over a Rock Box 12" promo that I passed up in the Virgin Megastore one Saturday because I needed to buy some other, now forgotten, record more. When I went back, of course, it had gone. I could buy it now easily and cheaply, but it wouldn't be the same.

Although I can place myself with confidence, I don't recall the show at all. I have a hazy feeling it was some kind of interview mixed with live tracks but I can't find a record of BBC sessions by the band. In passing I did find this kinda charming early interview for the Old Grey Whistle Test, though.

It was common to get live sets from the Montreux Jazz Festival on the telly and radio at that time but the only Run DMC set list I can find listed there is from 1988 which is too late. Perhaps they were playing somewhere in the UK to promote the new album, I don't know.

In any case, the music I was hearing blew me away and Run DMC became my first musical love, followed shortly after by Pop Will Eat Itself, a local band who, in an odd coincidence were booked as a support act on the Run DMC European tour in 1988. It reached Birmingham, at a club called The Hummingbird, in October and I was there, my first ever gig. I bought a t-shirt, of course, and later I bought a cassette bootleg of extraordinarily low quality.

By that point in the tour Pop Will Eat Itself had long since dropped out after appalling treatment by Run DMC fans who, I assume, were not open-minded enough to listen to a half-hour set of scratchy indie/hip hop crossover delivered by four white blokes with long greasy hair and leather trousers. Which was disappointing for me, but I was still wide-eyed and in awe of Public Enemy and then Run DMC themselves.

The band are famed for wearing Adidas gear and, although I don't think I knew it at the time I got into them, were sponsored by Adidas. Even before that deal the band wore Adidas Superstar trainers — shell toes — with no laces, but I have no recollection of that being important to me.

Sports brands were on my radar because the school playground was full of who had the latest Fila, Puma, Nike, Adidas, Lacoste, or whatever. I didn't even have table stakes for that game. My mum didn't believe in branded clothing ("You're just paying for the name. The trainers from the market and Woolworths are just as good.") and my paper round money didn't stretch very far.

At some point I remember getting a pair of Adidas Kicks, probably a birthday or Christmas present. They were the cheapest trainers in the Adidas range and nothing to do with the band but a lot to do with wanting to fit in. It worked too because, for a while at least, I wasn't wearing Woolworth's 4-stripe trainers that fastened with velcro. Later I picked up an Adidas cagoule from the sale rack at Harry Parkes and just about satisfied my teenage insecurity. 

--00--

If Run DMC were my first musical love, they were also my first musical break up. The fourth album, Tougher Than Leather, didn't do it for me in the same way that the other LPs had. Where they were raw, sparse, basic, and heavy, Tougher Than Leather was produced, flabby, complex and lightweight. For my tastes, at least. 

I wouldn't say I ghosted the band from that point, but it's fair to say I only paid them sporadic attention. More like flipping through photos from the early days of a romance and sending a 6-monthly what's up? text than any kind of meaningful relationship. I'd check out each new record, feel let down, die a little inside, and crawl back to Raising Hell for comfort. This disenchantment culminated with the release of Crown Royal in 2001. By this time I was DJing and writing about music for various places including my own fanzine. The closing lines of my review stung as sharply as only an ex-lover can:

"Once, Run DMC used to slay Sucker MCs, these days they just bus them in to appear on the album. Run DMC are parodies of themselves and it's apparent that the only rock they know about these days is the one some distance from a hard place. It's hard to see how they're going to get off it."

Ouch. was I hurting.

The sequencing of tracks on Raising Hell puts My Adidas, a celebration of the band's sneakers, immediately before Walk This Way, the band's cover of the 70s rock classic by Aerosmith. If you know anything about Run DMC it's probably Walk This Way or the cheesy (and also brilliant) Christmas in Hollis

On my pressing of the LP, My Adidas and Walk This Way are barely separated and, as the last beat of My Adidas pounds to a crunching halt there's a fractional pause, just enough to keep time, before the first hit of Walk This Way crashes in. Perhaps it's a strange thing to have a favourite of, but this is my absolute favourite transition on any record. I must have listened to it hundreds of times over the years.

My Adidas is on the playlist I share with my daughter for when we're doing the washing up and still, close to 40 years after I first placed the vinyl on my turnable, as it ends I am waiting for that next beat. It doesn't come, of course, and the emotional drop is palpable. 

Back when young me was wiring his brain to expect that dopamine hit, he wasn't wearing Adidas anything. My Adidas? Their Adidas and, in fact, originally Jam Master Jay's Adidas: "The black hats is mines. The Adidas, that’s me. How I dressed in high school is the way we dressed."

Their Adidas, yes ... until New Year's Eve 2006, in Skegness. That's the picture at the top of this post. It's traditional to be on the town in fancy dress before everyone gathers at the Jubilee Clock Tower to sing Auld Lang Syne at midnight. The previous year we'd dressed as robots and I'd made a "brain hat" with bubble wrap and flashing lights I'd liberated from pound shop deely boppers. For reasons my memory doesn't release right now we dressed up as Run DMC in 2006.

I was responsible for costumes and props. Down the end of the garden, in the shed, I built a ghettoblaster out of a large box, knobs from an old telly, some tights if I remember right (for the speaker grill) and loads of silver spray paint. I trawled charity shops and eBay for second-hand tracksuits, cheap costume fedora hats, plastic gold chains, and what turned out to be a skanky pair of used Superstars. 

--00--

It may be hard to believe, but up to this point I'm not even sure I knew what kind of trainers Run DMC were wearing. After I left school, branded fashion stopped being any kind of priority in my life. Music took over and I'd most likely be wearing a band t-shirt, jeans, and some Converse knock-off basketball boots from the market. (So Mum was right, naturally.) I'd never knowingly seen a pair of Superstars in real life. Now, though, holding this tatty, dirty, smelly pair in my hands I fell in love again.

But why? Adidas make zillions of different trainers and frankly I couldn't are less about them. I'm not into sneaker collecting or fetishism. I'm not waiting for the latest collab to drop, I don't have a closet full of box-fresh kicks, and you won't find me with a toothbrush scrubbing scuffs off the outsoles of any trainers I've ever owned. 

My trainers are for wearing and they get worn for every trip, every day until they wear out. I walk before work and again at lunchtime and on weekends I walk for a couple of hours. It takes a little over a year for a pair of Superstars to wear through from the bottom up, sometimes the toe shell comes away from the upper first but the inner heel always breaks down earlier.

I have two pairs on the go at a time, my daily drivers and a pair for doing DIY and gardening. There's a strict hierarchy too. When my dailies wear out they become the "working shoes" and the old working shoes go in the bin. I held onto a couple of pairs of old working shoes hoping to find somewhere that could recycle them so here's the last four pairs of Superstars I've had, oldest on the left to the ones I'm currently wearing on the right:


Maybe I identify with the brand itself? I suppose that's possible, but I don't kid myself that there is something romantic about the three stripes. Reading Sneaker Wars, the story of the Dassler family that splintered and took the town of Herzogenaurach with it, will dispel all ideas that Adidas is about anything other than the business.

Adolf (Adi) Dassler, the brother who founded Adidas, certainly had an altruistic yen for crafting sports shoes that were shaped by and extended the abilities of the athletes whose feet they graced. Despite this, even before the corporate buyouts that turned the company into the global behemoth it is today, he wasn't above underhand manoeuvres to put one over on his brother, Rudi, who founded Puma on the other side of the river. That's not to mention the question of worker's rights that affects Adidas like so many others. 

--00--

Historically, Superstars evolved from a couple of earlier shoes, the Olympiade and the Supergrip, via a high-top basketball boot, the Pro Model. (Take a look at this, or this, or this for the detail.) They revolutionised the sport and then crossed over into street fashion. I find this stuff interesting in the same way that I find evolution interesting, and systems thinking interesting, and iteration in software development interesting. But fascination is not enough to motivate my Superstar habit, surely? I mean, I'm not wearing Agile Manifesto trainers every day am I? 

So I don't have a trainer thing or an Adidas-the-brand thing going on. Perhaps I unconsciously want to be Run DMC? My photo is at the top of this post and it's not hard to see how unrealistic that would be as a goal. 

It'd be more realistic to wonder whether I want to be like them and, you know what, I would love to be even a fraction as cool as Run, DMC, and Jay but there's around zero chance of that happening. Perhaps less. My aspiration is to be myself in any situation and I've learned that dressing in a way that makes me comfortable aids me in that quest.

I am pretty sure it's something aesthetic about Superstars that attracts me and the fact that I have a similar inexplicable attraction to the Adidas trefoil logo (left, below) and disaffinity for the angular Equipment logo (right) supports that idea. 

Although these days it feels eternal, the trefoil has only been around since the 70s. The Equipment logo was introduced in the 90s and my negative reaction to it is very strong. I wouldn't buy clothing with it on even if it was identical to clothing with the trefoil in every other respect. I can't make any logical sense of this.

And if logic is out I wonder what I'm doing here. There's a whole field of philosophy around why different people find their joy in different things and, other than as a subject of study, I don't think I've got much to add to it. There is literally nothing about the classic Superstar that I don't adore and I'm unapologetic about it. Just hold the trainer in your hand and look at it:

Start at the bottom where the sole's herringbone pattern is sliced in tripartition by sinous curves, snaking across the heel, balls, and toe of the foot. Originally intended to grip tightly onto a basketball court's surface for pirouette turns, sharp changes of direction, and the sure-footed launch into a slam-dunk, this is not utilitarian physics-dictated functional engineering, this is beauty for beauty's sake.

Flip the sneaker over and realise that from the side you could recognise a Superstar by its silhouette alone. Iconic does not even come close. The universally-known three stripes, originally a device for strengthening the sides of the running shoes that launched Adidas, have perfect balance vertically and horizontally, whose eye would not be pleased by this shoe?

The heel bulges and curves down into the sole which then juts out coquettishly before resolving into the embedded stitching that draws the eye from back to front along a descending contour. The shape invites languorous study, an unhurried focus on each detail, lingering for a moment on the dogleg support  stitching, the embossed name, the alternating stripes and pinprick punctures, and finally arrival at the toe.

The toe! If the shoes themselves are iconic, then the toe is the icon's icon. Unique, surprising, a cross-hatched shell playfully caressed by light, enriched by the curvature of six radial arcs, their symmetry perfect, the manner in which they disappear into the laces and tongue beguiling.

The laces as a ladder or, if not a ladder, then a ramp. On this visual trip around the shoe we are now racing up the forefoot to the padded tongue replete with a logo that is often tweaked to tie in with whatever other design elements are in play. As we reach the top we leap over the open foot hole and grasp the heel pad, again logoed and again ripe for customisation, but often perfect with the simple trefoil. Exhausted now we slide slowly down the rear towards the underside, ready to go again.

Erm. Ahem.

For sure, there are colourways that I wouldn't touch, designer collaborations that mess with core elements to the detriment of the shoe, and ill-advised brand extensions that stick the name onto something other, but the classic can not be challenged. 

--00--

I didn't quite know where this was going when I started and it's largely been a stream of consciousness punctuated by excursions to track down a reference, find a picture, or check some detail. I think it's time to ask whether I'm any closer to understanding why I love the Superstar so much.

Well, if it wasn't for Run DMC I wouldn't know Superstars at all. It's only because I got into their early music at an impressionable age and then later dressed up as them for a party that I held a pair for the first time.

That definitely counts for something and perhaps there's some nostalgia and halo effect thrown in for good measure. However, I know that when I wear my trainers I don't feel all Jam Master James and I'm self-aware enough to know that no-one else is thinking "woah, cool chap alert!" so that's not the core of this story.

I'm not passionate about the brand. Adidas makes commodity footwear using corporate practices in a capitalist system with all the downsides of those things. When I buy a pair of trainers I'm certainly buying into some kind of branding, even if only because it's clear to anyone that looks at my feet who made my shoes, but I don't feel like I'm part of some exclusive club, however many limited-edition flavours they create. 

And so I come back to the strange concept of things that bring us pleasure. Superstars bring me pleasure in a way that I cannot satisfactorily explain, Yes, I know that's a let-down at the end of an essay like this at least, if an explanation is what you need. Superstars bring me pleasure and comfort, both physical and mental, and that counts for a lot. They're the shoes I like, worn the way I like, when I like to wear them. They're my Adidas.

Image Credits

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Meet Me Halfway?

  The Association for Software Testing is crowd-sourcing a book,  Navigating the World as a Context-Driven Tester , which aims to provide  responses to common questions and statements about testing from a  context-driven perspective . It's being edited by  Lee Hawkins  who is  posing questions on  Twitter ,   LinkedIn , Mastodon , Slack , and the AST  mailing list  and then collating the replies, focusing on practice over theory. I've decided to  contribute  by answering briefly, and without a lot of editing or crafting, by imagining that I'm speaking to someone in software development who's acting in good faith, cares about their work and mine, but doesn't have much visibility of what testing can be. Perhaps you'd like to join me?   --00-- "Stop answering my questions with questions." Sure, I can do that. In return, please stop asking me questions so open to interpretation that any answ...

The Best Programmer Dan Knows

  I was pairing with my friend Vernon at work last week, on a tool I've been developing. He was smiling broadly as I talked him through what I'd done because we've been here before. The tool facilitates a task that's time-consuming, inefficient, error-prone, tiresome, and important to get right. Vern knows that those kinds of factors trigger me to change or build something, and that's why he was struggling not to laugh out loud. He held himself together and asked a bunch of sensible questions about the need, the desired outcome, and the approach I'd taken. Then he mentioned a talk by Daniel Terhorst-North, called The Best Programmer I Know, and said that much of it paralleled what he sees me doing. It was my turn to laugh then, because I am not a good programmer, and I thought he knew that already. What I do accept, though, is that I am focussed on the value that programs can give, and getting some of that value as early as possible. He sent me a link to the ta...

Can Code, Can't Code, Is Useful

The Association for Software Testing is crowd-sourcing a book,  Navigating the World as a Context-Driven Tester , which aims to provide  responses to common questions and statements about testing from a  context-driven perspective . It's being edited by  Lee Hawkins  who is  posing questions on  Twitter ,   LinkedIn , Mastodon , Slack , and the AST  mailing list  and then collating the replies, focusing on practice over theory. I've decided to  contribute  by answering briefly, and without a lot of editing or crafting, by imagining that I'm speaking to someone in software development who's acting in good faith, cares about their work and mine, but doesn't have much visibility of what testing can be. Perhaps you'd like to join me?   --00-- "If testers can’t code, they’re of no use to us" My first reaction is to wonder what you expect from your testers. I am immediately interested ...

Beginning Sketchnoting

In September 2017 I attended  Ian Johnson 's visual note-taking workshop at  DDD East Anglia . For the rest of the day I made sketchnotes, including during Karo Stoltzenburg 's talk on exploratory testing for developers  (sketch below), and since then I've been doing it on a regular basis. Karo recently asked whether I'd do a Team Eating (the Linguamatics brown bag lunch thing) on sketchnoting. I did, and this post captures some of what I said. Beginning sketchnoting, then. There's two sides to that: I still regard myself as a beginner at it, and today I'll give you some encouragement and some tips based on my experience, to begin sketchnoting for yourselves. I spend an enormous amount of time in situations where I find it helpful to take notes: testing, talking to colleagues about a problem, reading, 1-1 meetings, project meetings, workshops, conferences, and, and, and, and I could go on. I've long been interested in the approaches I've evol...

Don't Know? Find Out!

In What We Know We Don't Know , Hillel Wayne crisply summarises a handful of research findings about software development, describes how the research is carried out and reviewed and how he explores it, and contrasts those evidence-based results with the pronouncements of charismatic thought leaders. He also notes how and why this kind of research is hard in the software world. I won't pull much from the talk because I want to encourage you to watch it. Go on, it's reasonably short, it's comprehensible for me at 1.25x, and you can skip the section on Domain-Driven Design (the talk was at DDD Europe) if that's not your bag. Let me just give the same example that he opens with: research shows that most code reviews focus more on the first file presented to reviewers rather than the most important file in the eye of the developer. What we should learn: flag the starting and other critical files to receive more productive reviews. You never even thought about that possi...

How do I Test AI?

  Recently a few people have asked me how I test AI. I'm happy to share my experiences, but I frame the question more broadly, perhaps something like this: what kinds of things do I consider when testing systems with artificial intelligence components .  I freestyled liberally the first time I answered but when the question came up again I thought I'd write a few bullets to help me remember key things. This post is the latest iteration of that list. Caveats: I'm not an expert; what you see below is a reminder of things to pick up on during conversations so it's quite minimal; it's also messy; it's absolutely not a guide or a set of best practices; each point should be applied in context; the categories are very rough; it's certainly not complete.  Also note that I work with teams who really know what they're doing on the domain, tech, and medical safety fronts and some of the things listed here are things they'd typically do some or all of. Testing ...

Express, Listen, and Field

Last weekend I participated in the LLandegfan Exploratory Workshop on Testing (LLEWT) 2024, a peer conference in a small parish hall on Anglesey, north Wales. The topic was communication and I shared my sketchnotes and a mind map from the day a few days ago. This post summarises my experience report.  Express, Listen, and Field Just about the most hands-on, practical, and valuable training I have ever done was on assertiveness with a local Cambridge coach, Laura Dain . In it she introduced Express, Listen, and Field (ELF), distilled from her experience across many years in the women’s movement, business, and academia.  ELF: say your key message clearly and calmly, actively listen to the response, and then focus only on what is relevant to your needs. I blogged a little about it back in 2017 and I've been using it ever since. Assertiveness In a previous role, I was the manager of a test team and organised training for the whole ...

Software Sisyphus

The Association for Software Testing is crowd-sourcing a book,  Navigating the World as a Context-Driven Tester , which aims to provide  responses to common questions and statements about testing from a  context-driven perspective . It's being edited by  Lee Hawkins  who is  posing questions on  Twitter ,   LinkedIn , Mastodon , Slack , and the AST  mailing list  and then collating the replies, focusing on practice over theory. I've decided to  contribute  by answering briefly, and without a lot of editing or crafting, by imagining that I'm speaking to someone in software development who's acting in good faith, cares about their work and mine, but doesn't have much visibility of what testing can be. Perhaps you'd like to join me?   --00-- "How can I possibly test 'all the stuff' every iteration?" Whoa! There's a lot to unpack there, so let me break it down a little: who is suggesting that "al...

Not a Happy Place

  A few months ago I stopped having therapy because I felt I had stabilised myself enough to navigate life without it. For the time being, anyway.  I'm sure the counselling helped me but I couldn't tell you how and I've chosen not to look deeply into it. For someone who is usually pretty analytical this is perhaps an interesting decision but I knew that I didn't want to be second-guessing my counsellor, Sue, or mentally cross-referencing stuff that I'd researched while we were talking. And talk was what we mostly did, with Sue suggesting hardly any specific tools for me to try. One that she did recommend was finding a happy place to visualise, somewhere that I could be out of the moment for a moment to calm disruptive thoughts. (Something like this .) Surprisingly, I found that I couldn't conjure anywhere up inside my head. That's when I realised that I've always had difficulty seeing with my mind's eye but never called it out. If I try to imagine ev...

Why Question?

Questions are a powerful testing tool and, like any tool, can be used in different ways in different scenarios with different motivations and different results. A significant part of my role is generating questions and I will generally have a lot of them. I will rarely ask them all, though, and I've put a lot of time and effort into learning to be comfortable with that. A couple of examples: I was in a meeting this week where the technical conversation was too deep for me to give a perspective from a position of knowledge. I could have disengaged, but I didn't. Instead, I asked occasional questions, not wanting to derail the discussion or disrupt the flow. Some were detail questions, to help grow my understanding. Some were scoping questions, to help understand motivations. The one that really landed, however, was about the focus of the meeting. Although I couldn't contribute at a low level, I understood enough to suspect that we were not discussing the key problem tha...