Saturday, May 5, 2018

Testing and Checklists


Our team's book club at Linguamatics is looking at the The Checklist Manifesto. I found it exceptionally readable, commendably short, and very direct about its key message, which I'd summarise as something like this: checklists can be extremely valuable, take care when writing them, and use them to free people up rather than tie them down.

For fun, I thought I'd try to extract a small set of checklists for checklists.

  • what problem are you are trying to solve? (e.g. whose perception, desire, situation)
  • what kind of problem is it? (e.g. simple, complicated, complex)
  • what kind of list do you need? (e.g. doing, reviewing)
  • what kind of items do you want? (e.g. actions, communications)
  • what kind of triggers do you have? (e.g. start of a task, decision point, review of result)

  • can you identify any critical items? (keep them)
  • can you assume list users will just do any of the items? (remove them)
  • can you leave room for judgement? (probably a good idea)
  • can you simplify the language? (you probably can)
  • can you clarify the layout? (you probably can)

  • trial the list. (in real-world situations)
  • take feedback. (from everyone)
  • refine the list. (for the end users)
  • maintain the list. (because it must keep up with its context)
  • treat the list as a tool. (like any other)
And Karo has just started a discussion on the book over at The Club.
Image: Amazon

2 comments:

  1. Can you use your checklist to check you checklist of checklists?

    ReplyDelete