What I particularly look for in meetups is information, inspiration, and the stimulation of ideas. And I wasn't disappointed in this one. Here's some assorted thoughts.
I wonder how much of my note-taking is me and how much is me in my context?
- ... and how much I would change were I to move somewhere else, or do a different job at Linguamatics
- ... given that I already know that I have evolved note-taking to suit particular tasks over time
- ... further, I already know that I use different note-taking approaches in different contexts. But why? Can I explore that more deeply?
Is this blog post notes?
- ... what is a note?
- ... perhaps this is an article? It doesn't feel like a formal report, although perhaps it could turn into one
- ... but it's more than simple aides memoire
- ... but it's not exactly full sentences
- ... but it started as notes. Then I iterated on them and they become a draft, of sorts
- ... but how? Why? According to who?
- ... and when do notes turn into something else?
- ... and when should notes turn into something else?
By writing up my notes for this post I have remembered other things that aren't in my notes
- ... and thought things that I didn't think at the time
- ... and, a week later, after discussing the evening with Karo, I've had more thoughts (and taken notes of them)
I showed my notes from CEWT 3 to one of the other participants at the event
- ... and I realised that my written notes are very wordy compared to others'
- ... and that I layer on top of them with emphasis, connections, sub-thoughts, new ideas etc
What axes of comparison make sense when considering alternative note-taking techniques?
- ... what do they give over pen and paper? (which scores on ubiquity and familiarity and flexibility)
- ... what do they give over a simple use of words? (perhaps transcription of "everything" is a baseline?)
- ... what about shorthand? (is simple compression a form of note taking?)
- ... is voice a media for notes? Some people use voice recorders
- ... sketchnoting is richer in some respects, but more time-consuming
What advantages might there be of constraining note-taking?
- ... Rapid Reporter appears to be a line-by-line tool, with no editing of earlier material
- ... the tooling around SBTM enforces a very strict syntax
- ... the concentration on structure over text of mind maps
How might contextual factors affect note-taking?
- ... writing on graph paper vs lined paper vs plain paper; coloured vs white
- ... one pen vs many different pens; different colour pens
- ... a blank page vs a divided page (e.g. Cornell)
- ... a blank page vs a page populated with e.g. Venn diagram, hierarchical structure, shapes, pie charts
- ... scrap paper vs a Moleskine
- ... pencil vs fountain pen pen vs crayon vs biro
Time allocation during note-taking
- ... what kinds of techniques/advice are there for deciding how to apportion time to note-taking vs listening/observing?
- ... are different kinds of notes appropriate when listening to a talk vs watching an event vs interacting with something (I do those differently)
What makes sense to put into notes?
- ... verbatim quotes?
- ... feelings?
- ... questions?
- ... suggestions?
- ... connections?
- ... emotions?
- ... notes about the notes?
- ... what doesn't make sense, if anything? Could it ever make sense?
I am especially inspired to see whether I can distil any conventions from my own note-taking. I have particular contexts in which I make notes on paper - meetups are one - and those where I make notes straight onto the computer - 1-1 with my team, for instance, but also when testing. I make notes differently on the computer in those two scenarios.
I have written before about how I favour plain text for note-taking on the computer and I have established conventions that suit me for that. I wonder are any conventions present in multiple of the approaches that I use?
Good thought, I'll just note that down.